top of page
  • Jing Gong

Patent Portfolio Management

The Importance of Strategic Decision-Making and Process optimization for a Value-generating Intellectual Property Portfolio

1. Introduction

For academic research centers (ARC), protecting intellectual property (IP) is essential for fostering innovation and facilitating the commercialization of groundbreaking discoveries. Patent portfolios play a crucial role in this process, but managing and maintaining them can be both complex and costly. This white paper explores the costs associated with patent portfolios and provides guidance on process optimization and strategic considerations to achieve a financially profitable portfolio. By understanding these costs and making informed decisions, research institutions can optimize their patent portfolio management strategy to achieve their objectives while minimizing expenses.

2. Key Cost Categories Associated with Patent Portfolios

The costs associated with a patent portfolio start with patent drafting and filing as well as patent prosecution, patent maintenance fees, and national-stage patent protection. While drafting and filing a utility patent application in the United States typically ranges from $5,000 to $15,000 or more, patent prosecution can almost double this cost. Additional maintenance fees, required to keep a patent in force, are due at 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years after the patent grant, with fees ranging from around $1,000 to $4,000 per payment. Further, obtaining international patent protection can significantly increase costs due to translation fees and engaging local counsel in each jurisdiction. This can lead to a single patent family incurring between $20,000 to $100,000 in costs. Put wipo link here.

3. The Importance of Regular Auditing and Execution within Your Patent Portfolio

3.1 Defining your Research Objectives and Commercialization Goals for Alignment with your Patent Portfolio: Regularly reviewing your patent portfolio ensures alignment with institutional objectives and helps prioritize resources effectively. By examining the relevance of patents in the context of the institution's research focus and commercialization strategy, ARCs can make informed decisions about which patents to maintain, which to abandon, and where to allocate resources for new patent applications or business development efforts.

3.2 Balancing Costs and Value: Understanding the costs associated with each patent allows institutions to make informed decisions about which patents to maintain and which to abandon or to actively push for externalization. This requires review of all associated patent costs, understanding of current ongoing research related to each patent, considering the remaining patent life and analyzing this in the context of commercial potential. Regular cost-benefit analysis helps institutions strike the right balance between protecting valuable inventions and managing expenses associated with patent portfolio maintenance.

3.3 Adapting your Business Development Strategy to Market Changes: As market conditions evolve, research institutions can adapt their patent strategies accordingly to maximize commercial opportunities when opportunities arise and reduce costs in less favorable market environments. This may involve understanding creatively repositioning technology and adjusting research and development efforts to suit the current market. This can also entail revising licensing strategies, or exploring new markets and industries where the institution's patented technologies may have a competitive advantage.

3.4 Monitoring Competitors and Identifying Potential Partners: Understanding each patent position and identifying leading players in the associated space can provide valuable insights into potential threats and opportunities in the market. Regularly monitoring academic and industry competitors allows research institutions to uncover new opportunities for collaboration and pinpoint potential licensing opportunities.

4. Best Practices for Optimizing Patent Portfolio Management within an ARC

4.1 Establish a Regular Review and Re-evaluation Schedule: Ideally, the review and re-evaluation of a patent portfolio should occur annually, or more frequently depending on the size and complexity of the portfolio. Regular reviews enable research institutions to adapt their patent strategies in response to changing market conditions and emerging opportunities. Reviews can take several months, and often if reviews are not in practice, it can take much longer to get a complete overview of a patent portfolio.

4.2 Engage Expertise: Involving technology transfer professionals and external innovation management consultants in the audit process is essential to ensure that the review is thorough, well-informed and unbiased. Leveraging the expertise of these professionals who have experience in development of specialty technologies is crucial to help ARCs gain new perspective on the commercial potential of their patents and identify potential risks and opportunities.

4.3 Analyze Risks and Potential for Value Creation: It is important to consider the potential development pathway of a patent position to understand associated value. Similarly, beyond the costs associated with each patent in the portfolio, considering factors such as claim coverage, enforceability, market potential, alignment with institutional research and impact objectives, and barriers to reach value provides an understanding of risk. This analysis helps ARCs make strategic decisions about which patents to maintain, which to abandon, and where to focus their IP investment.

4.4 Act on Review and Re-evaluation Findings: Following patent portfolio review, take appropriate actions such as supporting filing new patent applications, pursuing licensing opportunities, or discontinuing support for low-value patents. Acting on the insights gained from regular re-evaluations ensures that research institutions maintain a strong and relevant patent portfolio that aligns with their strategic objectives.

5. Conclusion

In today's dynamic market, it is essential for research institutions to make strategic decisions and regularly re-evaluate their patent portfolios to optimize resource allocation, maximize commercial value, and minimize expenses. By understanding the costs associated with patent portfolios and employing best practices for portfolio management, research institutions can successfully navigate the complexities of IP protection and commercialization. Ultimately, a proactive approach to patent portfolio management will enable research institutions to achieve their research objectives, foster innovation, and contribute to economic development and societal impact.

98 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page